Repository logo
English
Türkçe
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. ADA University
  3. CB5. ADA Theses, Dissertations and Final Projects
  4. School of Information Technologies and Engineering
  5. Image Captioning with Frozen Self-Supervised Vision Encoders

Image Captioning with Frozen Self-Supervised Vision Encoders

Date Issued
2026-04
Author(s)
Akhundzada, Abdulla
ADA University
Abstract
Self-supervised vision models such as DINOv3 produce rich, spatially detailed patch-level features without any text supervision. These features excel on dense prediction tasks (segmen- tation, depth estimation, keypoint matching), yet they remain disconnected from the language modality. This thesis investigates how a frozen DINOv3 ViT-S/16 encoder can contribute to image captioning when used alone and when fused with a pretrained language-aligned encoder. The preliminary investigation documents three attempts to bridge DINOv3 to a frozen large language model (Qwen2.5-3B) using only DINOv3 as the vision backbone: a BLIP-2-style Q-Former with ITC, ITM, and ITG objectives; a LLaVA-style MLP projection into the LLM embedding space; and a dino.txt-style contrastive vision block pretraining stage with a frozen text encoder. All three produce captioning metrics at least an order of magnitude below pub- lished baselines. The BLIP-2 bridge generates repetitive, degenerate captions. The LLaVA pipeline produces fluent but entirely hallucinated descriptions. A post-hoc analysis uncovers a 100× L2 norm mismatch between projected visual tokens and native LLM text embeddings, di- agnosing the LLaVA failure mechanistically. The contrastive vision block pretraining underfits at our data scale. These failures motivate a pivot to dual-backbone fusion. We pair frozen DINOv3 with frozen SigLIP 2 (ViT-L/16) and route their patch tokens through a small learnable fusion mod- ule whose output feeds a compact causal decoder initialized from Qwen3-0.6B token embed- dings. Four fusion variants are compared: NoFusion (single-backbone baseline), ConcatFu- sion, SequentialEnrichment, and a bidirectional ParallelTextConditioned module with a learned sigmoid gate. On the COCO Karpathy validation split, SigLIP 2 alone reaches CIDEr 0.396 at 10,000 steps while DINOv3 alone reaches only 0.065, quantifying the cost of the miss- ing language alignment. The ParallelTC fusion matches SigLIP 2-only at matched steps and pulls ahead at 40,000 steps (CIDEr 0.456 vs. 0.441 at 30,000 SigLIP 2-only steps). On out- of-domain radiology (RoCov2), fusion does not improve over SigLIP 2 alone, consistent with both backbones being trained on natural images. This thesis contributes a systematic experimental account of the DINOv3-to-language modal- ity gap, a mechanistic diagnosis of the embedding scale mismatch, and a compact fusion recipe in which DINOv3 contributes fine-grained spatial structure while SigLIP 2 contributes pre- trained language alignment. The findings clarify when self-supervised features add captioning signal and when they only add parameters.
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify